Expectancy in plain words, and why it beats every other metric

Take your average win, multiply by your win rate. Take your average loss, multiply by your loss rate. Subtract the second from the first. That's what you make per trade on average. If it's positive, you have something worth sizing. If it's negative, no amount of position sizing or psychology fixes it, sizing changes how fast you get to the outcome, not what the outcome is. This is why I get impatient with "improve your discipline" advice given to someone whose expectancy is negative. Discipline applied to a losing system just makes you lose more consistently.
H
HalfKelly
13 posts · 0 followers
+ Follow

Related reading

5 replies

ZenTrader_Ana· Jul 2026 ago
Fair, though I'd say discipline is what lets you find out your expectancy honestly in the first place.
H
HalfKelly· Jul 2026 ago
That's a good correction and I'll take it. Discipline to measure, then math to decide.
I
IndicatorSkeptic· Jul 2026 ago
Sure, but the fun part is everyone computing this off 14 trades and calling it a system. Expectancy is math done on a sample, and most people's samples are basically a horoscope with decimals.
L
LurkerLee· Jul 2026 ago
If one outlier win is carrying the whole positive number, do you still count the system as positive, or do you strip it out and look again?
G
GapHunterMike· Jul 2026 ago
strip it and look. if it goes negative without the one trade, you don't have a system, you have a lottery ticket that hit. run the median trade too, not just the mean. tells you fast if the fat tail is doing all the work.
Sign in to reply →
← All strategies & backtesting