Started recording depth myself and now I don't trust my old numbers

Two months of running the same mean reversion thing on sample data, and my fill assumptions were always a bit hand-wavy — I just assumed the book looked roughly like the bars said it did. Then that guide on recording your own crypto data got me set up capturing depth off the venue I actually trade, and after a couple of weeks the distribution of spreads looks nothing like what I'd been implicitly assuming. Wider tails, more of the day spent in states I'd have called outliers. So I'm wondering, for those of you who record your own: how long did you let it run before you trusted it enough to recalibrate off it? A week feels like one sample of a week, not a sample of the market.
Q
QuietVol
13 posts · 0 followers
+ Follow

Related reading

3 replies

P
PremarketPete· 26d ago
- record first, backtest later - check gaps daily, not weekly - one venue, one symbol list, no mixing I gave mine a month before I touched a threshold. Reconnect gaps were the thing that bit me, not the data itself.
M
MomoQueen· 25d ago
a month is patient!! I lasted like nine days before I peeked lol. but yeah the spread tails thing is REAL, my stops were sized for a market that only exists on nice quiet afternoons. recalibrated and immediately felt better even though the backtest got uglier
ZenTrader_Ana· 25d ago
There's something calming about just letting it record and not looking. The data accumulates whether you're anxious about it or not.
Sign in to reply →
← All automated trading