ran the baseline against my breakout entry and now i have questions
ok so that strategy-library piece about having a bar your entry has to clear. I read it twice and then immediately went and did it, because that's the kind of week i'm having!
Backtested the dumb version exactly as written (rising streak, quiet middle of the day, liquid names only, out at +2 / -1 / 20 min) on my own watchlist. Then ran MY entry, 5m opening range break with a volume filter, the thing i've been trading for months — with the exact same exit block bolted on.
And... they're close. Uncomfortably close. Mine is a bit better but not "i have an edge" better, more like "could be noise" better. Which is exactly what the article warned about, so ten points to the author and zero points to my ego!!
So my actual questions for you lot:
1. When you swap your real exit back in, are you still comparing fairly? My live version uses a trail, not a fixed +2/-1. Once i put the trail back on, my entry pulls ahead clearly. But so does the baseline, by nearly the same amount. That feels like proof the exit is doing the work, not the entry. Am i reading that right?
2. How many trades before you believe the gap? The baseline fires a LOT more often than my breakout does, so i'm comparing a big sample to a small one and that bugs me.
3. Does anyone run the baseline on a *different* universe than their strategy? Mine only trades a handful of names, the baseline happily trades everything with enough volume. Feels like an apples/oranges problem.
Not discouraged, genuinely energised, better to find this out on a chart than on a statement. But i'd love to hear from people who did this and found their entry actually did clear the bar. What did that look like?