STRATEGY LIBRARY

The same entry at three sensitivities — a parameter sensitivity check

Contents
Not three strategies — one entry at three settings, posted together so you can see what the parameter actually does. This is the cheapest test there is for whether an idea is real.

1. The three versions

# Tight — fewer trades if ChangeAngle(60) > 30 and Strength > 130: Buy()# Middle if ChangeAngle(60) > 20 and Strength > 115: Buy()# Loose — many trades if ChangeAngle(60) > 12 and Strength > 105: Buy()

2. How to read the three

Run all three over the same period and compare trade count first, result second.
Pattern across the threeWhat it means
results change smoothlythe parameter is describing something real
the middle is dramatically better than both neighboursyou found a coincidence
only the tight version worksa small sample of a good period looking like skill
all three loseat least you learned it cheaply
What you are looking for is whether the middle and loose versions still work. An idea that survives being loosened has something behind it. An idea that works at exactly one threshold found a pattern in your sample — see eleven conditions, four trades a month for where that ends.

3. Move the window with the angle

The angle and the window are not independent. Holding ChangeAngle's threshold fixed while you widen its window is not a mild change, it is a much stricter condition — a slope in degrees over a longer stretch asks for a far larger move. Both were moved when these three were swept. Otherwise the least sensitive version simply never trades, and it is very easy to read that as a result rather than as a mistake.

4. When this test misleads

If all three versions share a condition that is itself overfitted, loosening the other numbers proves nothing. Vary one dimension at a time. It also misleads if the three versions produce very different trade counts and you compare average return without noticing. Ten trades at +2% and two hundred at +0.3% are not comparable results, and after costs they are not even the same sign — a round trip on this population costs about 0.75% (what day trading a US stock really costs).

5. What to change first

Nothing here. This file is a test, not a strategy. Take the version that survives, then give it proper exits and a liquidity floor before you consider running it — exit rules every day trading strategy needs and the liquidity filter. Run the sweep on your own recordings: how to backtest a day trading strategy on US stocks.

Educational template for research and backtesting. Not investment advice and not a signal service.

Related reading

← All strategy library

Originally published by TraderWe on July 27, 2026. You may quote and link to this page. Republishing the full text without a link back to the original is not permitted.

5 replies

DataDrivenDee· Jul 2026 ago
This is the wiggle test packaged as something you can just run. Much more likely to actually get used.
MLcurious· Jul 2026 ago
Seeing three versions side by side taught me more than reading about overfitting did.
G
GapHunterMike· Aug 2026 ago
three points is fine but log the trade count too. tight one might only fire twice a month. smooth results on 2 trades means nothing.
D
DrawdownDave· Aug 2026 ago
I once ran a version of this and picked the setting with the best number without looking at how many fills each one had. Turned out the winner was three trades in a whole sample. Learned that one the expensive way.
F
FiveMinFiona· Aug 2026 ago
Nice format. I'd add a fourth column to whatever you record: trades, win rate, avg result, and worst single day. The shape across settings tells you more than any single row.
Sign in to reply →