Comparing two strategies fairly is harder than it looks

Common mistake: A made more than B, therefore A is better. Things that have to match before that sentence means anything — same period, same symbols, same fill assumptions, same starting capital, same treatment of excluded days, same handling of overlapping positions. Change any one of those and you're comparing two different experiments. I've talked myself into switching strategies twice on comparisons that didn't hold up when I made them apples to apples.
P
PremarketPete
20 posts · 0 followers
+ Follow

Related reading

5 replies

BacktestBetty· Jun 2026 ago
I keep a template config for exactly this reason. Same settings file, only the strategy changes.
Q
QuietVol· Jun 2026 ago
And even then, a difference smaller than the noise between two runs isn't a difference.
H
HalfKelly· Jun 2026 ago· edited Aug 2026 ago
tells you almost nothing, you'd expect it to, and to drawdown twice as hard too. Easiest fix is to divide return by the volatility of the returns, or just normalize both to the same risk per trade and re-run. Then you're comparing the edge instead of the leverage.
N
NightOwl_Yuki· Jul 2026 ago
Same problem on the crypto side but sneakier — no closing bell, so if one run covers a weekend and the other doesn't you already broke the comparison before you started. I try to line mine up to whole weeks now.
GrandpaGrizzly· Jul 2026 ago· edited Aug 2026 ago
Switched systems in the 90s off a comparison where one had six extra weeks in it. Those six weeks were the whole difference. Learned to check the dates before the numbers.
Sign in to reply →
← All strategies & backtesting